This study will use the updated methodological guidance for conducting a scoping review developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Accordingly, this review aims to map the available evidence to provide an overview of strategies for engaging senior citizens and informal caregivers in health policy development.Ī scoping review will be conducted. Encouraging senior citizen participation through active engagement in the policymaking process enhances the provision of better services and the creation of responsive policies and is critical to better healthcare. There has been limited focus on senior citizen and informal caregiver engagement in policy development. #Signpost reviews 2017 seriesA series of ongoing and future methodological projects identified by the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group to further refine the methodology are planned.Ĭare for senior citizens is a global policy issue. Furthermore, it aligns with the PRISMA-ScR, which can be used to report the conduct of a scoping review. The latest JBI guidance for scoping reviews provides up-to-date guidance that can be used by authors when conducting a scoping review. Furthermore, it is aligned with the PRISMA-ScR to ensure consistent reporting. #Signpost reviews 2017 how toThe updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research. The updated chapter was endorsed by JBI's International Scientific Committee in 2020. #Signpost reviews 2017 manualThis process led to updated guidance for scoping reviews published in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. As such, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group recognized the need to revise the guidance to align with the current state of knowledge and reporting standards in evidence synthesis.īetween 20, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group expanded its membership extensively reviewed the literature engaged via annual face-to-face meetings, regular teleconferences, and email correspondence sought advice from methodological experts facilitated workshops and presented at scientific conferences. The updates reflect ongoing and substantial developments in approaches to scoping review conduct and reporting. In 2014, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group developed guidance for scoping reviews that received minor updates in 2017 and was most recently updated in 2020. The increasing popularity of scoping reviews has been accompanied by the development of a reporting guideline: the PRISMA-ScR. In this manner, scoping reviews provide a comprehensive overview to address broader review questions than traditionally more specific systematic reviews of effectiveness or qualitative evidence. Scoping reviews draw on evidence from any research methodology and may also include evidence from non-research sources, such as policy. Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to informing decision-making and research based on the identification and examination of the literature on a given topic or issue. The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |